Edition · March 9, 2017
The Daily Fuckup: March 9, 2017
A grim little dispatch from the first Trump spring: a health-care push met a wall of backlash, the White House kept tripping over ethics, and the administration’s staffing choices looked increasingly like a boy’s club with a flag on the door.
March 9, 2017 brought a fresh helping of Trump-world self-inflicted damage. House Republicans pushed the health-care repeal bill forward, but the day was dominated by warnings from hospitals, doctors, and seniors that the plan would rip coverage away and leave the White House owning the consequences. At the same time, the administration was still getting hammered over Kellyanne Conway’s Ivanka Trump plug, with the federal ethics office publicly scolding the White House for refusing to discipline her. And a newly surfaced hiring pattern under Trump underscored how much the administration’s own staffing choices were already clashing with its own talk about representing everyone.
Closing take
If the Trump White House wanted March 9 to look like momentum, it got the opposite: a legislative push that deepened public alarms, an ethics mess that refused to die, and a staffing story that made the “everybody wins” branding look like a bad joke. The common thread was not ideology but sloppiness — the kind that leaves a trail in public filings, official letters, and angry statements from everyone who has to live with the mess.
Story
Health-care backlash
Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup
House Republicans moved the repeal-and-replace bill forward on March 9, but the political weather around it was turning ugly fast. Hospitals, physicians, and patient advocates were warning that the plan would raise costs, strip coverage, and hand Trump a problem he had spent the campaign promising to solve. The day did not produce final legislative defeat, but it did produce the kind of mounting backlash that can turn a supposedly triumphant rollout into a credibility sinkhole.
Open story + comments
Story
Ethics boomerang
Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess
The White House was still getting hit for Kellyanne Conway’s televised endorsement of Ivanka Trump’s products, and the federal ethics office made clear it was not buying the administration’s excuses. On March 9, the controversy was no longer a stray cable-news embarrassment; it had become a durable example of how quickly Trump officials were blurring public office and private gain. The refusal to discipline Conway kept the scandal alive and widened the sense that ethics rules were optional in this White House.
Open story + comments
Story
Male-heavy staffing
Confidence 4/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble
A fresh look at early Trump personnel choices showed women were landing only about 27 percent of appointed roles, a figure that looked especially embarrassing in a White House that had spent the month proclaiming Women’s History Month. That did not make the appointments illegal, but it did make the administration’s image problem obvious: the president was celebrating women in public while staffing the government like it had a very old-fashioned idea of who belongs in power. It was a symbolic screwup, but one with real political value for critics who wanted to argue that Trump’s brand of populism was mostly for show.
Open story + comments
