Edition · December 24, 2022

The Daily Fuckup: December 24, 2022

Trump’s Christmas Eve legal strategy was basically to wrap a long-shot immunity argument in ribbon and hope the courts didn’t notice. The day’s real action was a pre-holiday scramble to stall, deflect, and reframe a pile of problems that kept getting worse.

On December 24, 2022, Trump-world’s biggest screwup was not one dramatic new scandal but a very visible legal flail: his lawyers kept pressing broad immunity claims in the Jan. 6 fallout while the broader Mar-a-Lago documents mess still hung over the operation. The common thread was delay, and the visible consequence was that Trump’s team kept betting that procedural mud could substitute for a substantive defense. That strategy may have bought time, but it also underscored how many of his biggest problems were already in motion.

Closing take

Christmas Eve is supposed to be for carols, not constitutional cosplay. But Trump’s corner kept turning every legal setback into a plea for more runway, and by this point the runway was getting very short.

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

The Mar-a-Lago documents mess stayed stubbornly alive

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Trump’s classified-documents problem was still hanging over the holiday week, with the investigation and related litigation continuing to deepen the sense that the former president had no clean exit ramp. Even without a single explosive filing on December 24 itself, the day sat inside a broader sequence of setbacks showing that the documents fight was not fading away. The screwup was the original one, but the damage kept compounding.

Open story + comments

Story

Trump’s Christmas Eve immunity filing pushed the same old boundary fight

★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5 Major mess

Trump’s team filed a Christmas Eve appeal in the Jan. 6 criminal case, pressing the argument that presidential immunity should shield him from prosecution for official acts. The move did not decide the case, but it kept the fight over the scope of a former president’s protection squarely in front of the courts.

Open story + comments