Edition · June 29, 2024

Trump’s Saturday of Court-Case Acrobatics

A backfill edition for June 29, 2024, built around the legal and political messes Trump was trying to outrun while the post-conviction machinery kept grinding.

On June 29, 2024, the Trump universe was still living inside the fallout from the hush-money conviction, with fresh court filings and legal maneuvering aimed at undoing or delaying the damage. The day’s biggest screwup was less a single tweet than a larger pattern: Trump kept betting that process, immunity, and delay would erase consequences that were already sticking to his campaign and his brand. This edition centers on the strongest documented Trump-world setbacks materially in play that day, with the legal fight over the conviction and the broader election-interference mess taking center stage.

Closing take

Trump’s favorite workaround remained the same: if the facts are bad, lawyer harder. On June 29, that strategy still looked less like a comeback plan than a very expensive confession that the original mess was real.

Support the work

Help support this site

If this nightly edition saves you time, reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

Trump’s immunity push keeps the January 6 case in the frame

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Trump’s Supreme Court immunity appeal was still pending on June 29, 2024, with the justices having heard arguments in April but not yet ruling. The fight kept the election-interference case at the center of the campaign and highlighted the question of how far presidential immunity can reach.

Open story + comments

Story

Trump’s hush-money conviction sends his lawyers into another court maze

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Trump’s legal team kept pushing to move the New York hush-money conviction into federal court and to wipe out the verdict by leaning on presidential immunity arguments. It was a reminder that the campaign’s main post-conviction strategy was not to win the public case, but to keep slamming procedural doors until one finally opens.

Open story + comments