Edition · August 1, 2024

Trump World’s Worst Self-Owns, July 31, 2024 Edition

A day of race-baiting, evasions, and damage-control that only made the campaign’s problems louder.

July 31 was not a subtle day for Trump-world. The biggest story was Donald Trump’s ugly, chaotic appearance before Black journalists, where he doubled down on grievance politics and managed to hand his opponents a fresh pile of footage. The other notable thread was the Trump campaign’s increasingly frantic effort to bury Project 2025 after weeks of association with the movement’s authors and agenda. None of it was a policy triumph; all of it was a reminder that the campaign’s favorite move is to create the mess, then call the mop up a smear.

Closing take

The through-line here is simple: Trump-world keeps trying to sell strength, but it keeps delivering instability, contradiction, and free opposition research. On July 31, 2024, the campaign got both the kind of attention it wanted and the kind it absolutely did not. The result was a day that made the candidate look thinner, meaner, and less in control than his allies would like to admit.

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

Trump Questions Harris’s Race at NABJ Event in Chicago

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Donald Trump’s July 31 appearance before the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago turned contentious when he questioned Kamala Harris’s racial identity, clashed with moderator Rachel Scott, repeated the “Black jobs” line, and drew immediate criticism. NABJ said it had also been in touch with Harris’s team and was discussing a possible September Q&A.

Open story + comments

Story

Trump Campaign Disowns Project 2025 as Heritage Shuffles the Effort’s Leadership

★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5 Major mess

On July 30, 2024, Donald Trump’s campaign said Project 2025 was not the campaign’s plan, as Heritage said Paul Dans had stepped down from the transition project. The overlap between Trump-world figures and the blueprint remains politically useful to opponents, but the public record is clearer than the spin: the project is a Heritage-led effort, and Trump’s campaign is trying to keep it at arm’s length.

Open story + comments