Edition · November 13, 2024

Trump’s transition turns into a credibility bonfire

Two days after winning the election, Trump managed to combine a Pentagon shocker, a law-enforcement grenade, and a self-inflicted congressional vacuum into one very loud Wednesday.

November 13, 2024, was the day Trump’s post-election transition stopped looking merely chaotic and started looking structurally unserious. He shocked the Pentagon by tapping Fox News host Pete Hegseth to run the Defense Department, then detonated a wider political mess by nominating Matt Gaetz for attorney general, a choice that immediately dragged fresh scrutiny onto a nominee already under ethics and misconduct cloud. Gaetz’s resignation from Congress added another layer of dysfunction, creating a House vacancy and suggesting the transition was willing to burn down norms faster than it could build a governing team.

Closing take

The throughline is simple: Trump wasn’t just filling posts, he was signaling that loyalty and grievance mattered more than competence, confirmability, or basic governance. That may thrill the base in the short term, but it is also how you turn a transition into a running argument that the incoming president is not taking the job seriously enough.

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

Trump shocks the Pentagon by handing Defense to Pete Hegseth

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Trump’s nomination of Pete Hegseth for defense secretary set off alarm across the Pentagon and beyond because it put an inexperienced cable pundit in line to oversee the world’s largest military. The choice immediately raised questions about readiness, judgment, and whether loyalty had once again outranked competence.

Open story + comments

Story

Trump picks Matt Gaetz for attorney general and immediately inherits a full-blown ethics disaster

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Trump’s decision to nominate Matt Gaetz for attorney general turned a transition personnel move into a legal and political mess on contact. The pick revived scrutiny of a nominee already under investigation and prompted immediate alarm over whether the Justice Department was being treated like a loyalty prize rather than the nation’s top law-enforcement post.

Open story + comments