Edition · December 12, 2024
Trump’s December 12, 2024 screwups edition
A backfill look at the day Trump turned his post-election media triumph into a fresh pile of self-inflicted problems: Jan. 6 pardons, price-talk whiplash, and a loyalty-first VOA pick that invited a fight over public broadcasting.
On December 12, 2024, Trump managed the rare feat of turning a flattering media moment into a day full of collateral damage. His Time Person of the Year profile and interview gave him a bigger platform — and also a bigger record of contradictions, especially on Jan. 6 pardons and inflation. Meanwhile, his choice of Kari Lake to run Voice of America sharpened the sense that he intended to treat a congressionally funded broadcaster as a loyalty test, not a news organization.
Closing take
For Trump, the problem on December 12 wasn’t that he lacked airtime. It was that every microphone seemed to expose another place where the campaign’s slogans ran into the hard edge of reality, law, or basic institutional resistance.
Story
Jan. 6 revenge
Confidence 5/5
★★★★★Fuckup rating 5/5
Five-alarm fuckup
Trump used a high-profile interview and day’s worth of coverage to say Jan. 6 pardons would begin almost immediately after he takes office, reviving one of the ugliest promises from his post-election reset. The statement gave critics a fresh target and undercut any attempt to sell his next presidency as a sober, law-and-order reboot.
Open story + comments
Story
Price-promise crack
Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess
In TIME’s Dec. 12, 2024 Person of the Year package, Trump said it is hard to bring prices down once they rise, a remark that qualified his campaign promise to lower grocery costs. The interview was conducted Nov. 25 and published Dec. 12.
Open story + comments
Story
VOA loyalty play
Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess
Critics said Donald Trump’s choice of Kari Lake to lead Voice of America signaled a loyalty test for the taxpayer-funded broadcaster. The announcement was not a formal appointment, but it raised fresh questions about political pressure on a newsroom meant to serve overseas audiences independently.
Open story + comments