Trump Starts the Term by Cutting the Guards

Edition · January 26, 2025

Trump Starts the Term by Cutting the Guards

A Friday-night purge of inspectors general set off immediate legal blowback and revived the oldest Trump habit in Washington: firing the referees before they can whistle.

The opening Trump screwup of the new term was not subtle: a mass dismissal of inspectors general, carried out with little notice and a lot of legal risk. The move immediately drew accusations that the White House had ignored the statute requiring advance notice to Congress, turning a routine personnel action into a test case about whether Trump wants oversight at all. For a day one move, it was a pretty clean example of maximum power, minimum discipline.

Closing take

If the first week is about setting tone, this one said the quiet part out loud: Trump wants fewer watchdogs, fewer brakes, and fewer adults in the room. That may thrill the base, but it also hands critics a simple and damaging argument — the administration is not just bending norms, it is taking a hammer to the people paid to notice when it does.

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

Trump’s Inspector General Purge Hands His Critics a Gift-Wrapped Oversight Fight

Watchdogs Purged Confidence 5/5

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

The administration’s late-night removal of roughly 17 inspectors general has quickly become a fight over law, process, and whether Trump is dismantling the offices meant to catch waste and abuse before they start. The immediate problem is not just the sheer scale of the firings, but the claim from lawmakers and watchdogs that the White House skipped the required notice to Congress. That makes the move look less like a managerial cleanup and more like a deliberate attempt to blindfold the referees.

Open story + comments