Edition · March 21, 2025
Trump’s March 21, 2025 screwups edition
Backfill for March 21, 2025 in America/New_York. A day defined by legal shield-building, institutional retaliation, and the kind of self-protection that tends to read like guilt management.
On March 21, 2025, Trump-world had a rough day on multiple fronts: the Justice Department moved to narrow Trump’s exposure in Jan. 6 civil litigation, the White House kept pressing ahead with hardball personnel and institutional moves, and the administration’s broader posture toward critics kept feeding the exact case that Trump is using the presidency as a personal legal moat. This backfill edition focuses on the strongest, best-documented screwups that materially landed on that date.
Closing take
The throughline from March 21 is simple: when your central governing instinct is to make legal problems disappear by presidential muscle, you usually make the original problem look worse. That’s a bad look in court, a worse look in public, and exactly the kind of mess Trump keeps insisting is everyone else’s fault.
Story
Legal shield
Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup
The Justice Department asked a court to substitute the United States for President Trump in civil lawsuits tied to the Jan. 6 attack, arguing he was acting within the scope of his office. The request is not a ruling, and the court has not yet decided whether to accept it.
Open story + comments
Story
Retaliation machine
Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess
The White House rescinded its order targeting Paul Weiss on March 21, 2025, after the firm agreed to pro bono commitments and changes to its hiring and promotion practices. The administration also issued a same-day memorandum pressing lawyers and law firms it says engage in abusive litigation.
Open story + comments
Story
Favor bank
Confidence 3/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble
Trump’s clemency posture on March 21 kept highlighting a deeper ethical problem: the pardon power is being used in ways that invite questions about loyalty, favoritism, and whether criminal justice is just another Trump-branded patronage system. Even when the individual cases are legally clean, the political smell is getting harder to ignore.
Open story + comments