Edition · September 16, 2025

The Daily Fuckup: September 16, 2025

A backfill edition from the day Trump’s hardball on universities and his own legal baggage kept colliding with reality.

September 16, 2025 delivered a neat little snapshot of Trump-world governance by grievance: punish the universities, re-litigate the 2020 election fight, and call it strength. The day’s strongest screwups were less about one dramatic collapse than a pattern of overreach that immediately generated lawsuits, fresh criticism, and reminders that a lot of this agenda runs on bluff until a judge or a filing says otherwise. These were the kinds of moves that look tough in a rally line and messy in court the moment they hit paper.

Closing take

The common thread here is simple: Trump and his allies keep trying to turn political vengeance into governing method, and the institutions they bully keep answering with subpoenas, lawsuits, and judicial orders. That is not a great sign of competence. It is, however, very on-brand.

Support the work

Help support this site

If this nightly edition saves you time, reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

Georgia’s high court leaves Trump case in Willis’s rearview mirror

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

Georgia’s Supreme Court declined to hear Fani Willis’s appeal, leaving in place the ruling that disqualified her and her office from the Trump election case and sending the matter toward a replacement prosecutor.

Open story + comments

Story

UC system says Trump is trying to shake down higher education at scale

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

University of California students, faculty, staff, and labor groups sued the Trump administration after it escalated funding threats and settlement demands tied to UCLA. The suit argues the White House is using civil-rights enforcement as a cudgel against academic freedom, and the dispute immediately sharpened into a fight over whether federal money is being wielded as leverage for ideological control.

Open story + comments