Story · February 11, 2021

Mike Lee’s objection forced the Trump-Tuberville call off the Senate record

Floor fight over a disputed call Confidence 5/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: House managers withdrew the challenged language after Sen. Mike Lee objected during the Feb. 10 impeachment-trial presentation; the matter was not permanently removed from the record at that point.

The Senate’s impeachment trial of Donald Trump hit a brief procedural snag on February 10, 2021, after Sen. Mike Lee objected to House managers’ description of a call involving Trump and Sen. Tommy Tuberville. The managers had used the call to argue that Trump was still focused on delaying the certification of the 2020 election while the Capitol attack was underway. When Lee said the account was false, the managers withdrew the challenged language. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/02/10/CREC-2021-02-10-pt1-PgS615-4.pdf))

The exchange came in the middle of the House case, which was built around the claim that Trump helped incite the Jan. 6 attack and then failed to act to stop it. In their presentation, managers said Trump called Tuberville about an hour after the siege began and pressed him to delay certification. They also played Rudy Giuliani’s voicemail to Tuberville, in which Giuliani said he was calling to discuss how the certification hearing was being rushed and asked Republican allies to help slow it down. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/02/10/CREC-2021-02-10-pt1-PgS615-4.pdf))

Lee’s objection turned on a narrower point: he said the managers had put words in his mouth when they described the phone traffic connected to the call. After a short back-and-forth on the floor, the managers said they were happy to withdraw the quote. The Senate then moved on, with the disputed material left out of the record for the moment and the broader trial still centered on Trump’s conduct before and during the attack. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/02/10/CREC-2021-02-10-pt1-PgS615-4.pdf))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the legislation

Read the bill or hearing record, then contact the federal lawmakers responsible for the measure and ask for a written response about the specific vote or policy at issue.

Timing: Before the next scheduled committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.