Story · February 22, 2021

Supreme Court Denies Review in Trump-Backed Wisconsin Election Case

Courtroom dead end Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: The Supreme Court denied review, not the merits, in the Wisconsin and Pennsylvania election cases on Feb. 22, 2021.

On Feb. 22, 2021, the Supreme Court denied the petition in Donald J. Trump, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, et al., the Wisconsin election case docketed as No. 20-882. The docket entry is brief: “Petition DENIED.” It gives no explanation and does not resolve the fraud claims raised in the post-election litigation. A certiorari denial is not a ruling on the merits. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-882.html?utm_source=openai))

The court also denied review that day in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid, No. 20-542. That docket shows the petition was filed in October 2020, a motion to expedite was denied later that month, and the petition itself was denied on Feb. 22, 2021. The disposition was a cert denial, not a substantive decision on the underlying election dispute. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-542.html?utm_source=openai))

Those denials mattered because they ended the bid for Supreme Court review in those cases. They did not amount to a blanket endorsement of the lower courts’ reasoning, and they did not create a Supreme Court ruling on the 2020 election itself. They were refusals to hear the cases. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-882.html?utm_source=openai))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.