Story · March 10, 2021

Michael Cohen says he’s back for a seventh interview in Manhattan DA Trump probe

Legal cloud Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This story has been updated to clarify that Michael Cohen was expected to return for a seventh interview on March 10, 2021, rather than having already completed it at the time of publication.

Michael Cohen was set to go back to the Manhattan district attorney’s office on March 10, 2021, telling Reuters he expected a seventh interview in the criminal investigation examining Donald Trump’s finances. The day did not bring a charging decision or a new public filing. It did show that prosecutors were still taking another pass through one of the inquiry’s most familiar witnesses. ([kelo.com](https://kelo.com/2021/03/10/trumps-former-fixer-michael-cohen-to-meet-again-with-manhattan-da-in-trump-probe/?utm_source=openai))

Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, had already met repeatedly with investigators by that point. His return fit into a broader probe that had moved through witness interviews and financial records over time, rather than a single burst of courtroom action. On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court declined to block the release of Trump’s records to Manhattan prosecutors, and the district attorney’s office later said it had taken possession of tax and other financial documents central to the case. ([cbsnews.com](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-allows-release-of-trump-tax-returns/?utm_source=openai))

The investigation has focused on whether Trump’s business empire misstated asset values for loans and insurance or understated them for tax purposes, according to reporting around the case. Those were investigative questions, not findings of wrongdoing on March 10. The significance of Cohen’s appearance was narrower and more concrete: prosecutors were still talking to a witness with direct knowledge of Trump’s business and legal dealings, and the inquiry was still active. ([washingtonpost.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-tax-returns-manhattan-district-attorney/2021/02/25/be61b6b4-7779-11eb-8115-9ad5e9c02117_story.html?utm_source=openai))

For Trump, that meant the Manhattan case was still live and still working through records and testimony in the background. It was not a courtroom moment. It was another sign that the probe had not stalled. ([kelo.com](https://kelo.com/2021/03/10/trumps-former-fixer-michael-cohen-to-meet-again-with-manhattan-da-in-trump-probe/?utm_source=openai))

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.