Story · March 30, 2021

Two Capitol Police Officers Sue Trump Over Jan. 6 Injuries

Jan. 6 lawsuit Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This lawsuit was filed on March 30, 2021, by Capitol Police officers James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby over injuries they say they suffered during the Jan. 6 attack.

Two U.S. Capitol Police officers filed a civil lawsuit on March 30, 2021, accusing Donald Trump of helping spark the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and of contributing to the injuries they say they suffered that day. The plaintiffs, James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby, said Trump’s words and conduct helped create the conditions for the mob that overran the building.

The suit adds a personal damages claim to the growing body of Jan. 6 litigation. It does not resolve the question of Trump’s responsibility, but it puts that question before a federal court in a case built around the officers’ account of what happened to them during the breach.

The complaint alleges that Trump’s repeated false claims about the 2020 election, along with his public pressure campaign around the vote count, helped inflame supporters who later turned violent at the Capitol. Any such case would still have to work through the usual legal hurdles, including causation and immunity arguments, before it could reach a final judgment.

Blassingame and Hemby are among the first Capitol Police officers to sue Trump directly over the riot. Their filing turned a national political fight into a civil claim for damages, with the officers asking a court to treat the attack not just as a political event, but as a source of personal injury with alleged legal consequences.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.