Story · October 23, 2021

October’s Senate report put Trump’s DOJ pressure campaign on the record

Post-election fallout Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This story references a Senate Judiciary Committee report released on Oct. 7, 2021. It was not newly released on Oct. 23.

By Oct. 23, 2021, the central documentary marker in the fight over Donald Trump’s postelection push was already on the table: a Senate Judiciary Committee report released Oct. 7, 2021, along with supporting testimony, on Trump’s pressure campaign aimed at the Justice Department. The report said an eight-month investigation had found new details about direct pressure on DOJ leadership and described the committee’s work as its first comprehensive accounting of those efforts. ([judiciary.senate.gov](https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/dem/releases/following-8-month-investigation-senate-judiciary-committee-releases-report-on-donald-trumps-scheme-to-pressure-doj-and-overturn-the-2020-election))

The timing matters. The report was not a fresh development on Oct. 23. It came two weeks earlier, after months of investigation, and it built on an existing record that already included Justice Department action on the January 6 investigation and earlier congressional efforts to preserve records and examine the role of top officials after the election. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s public statement on the January 6 probe, issued in early 2021, reflected that federal work was already underway before the Senate report landed. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-merrick-b-garland-investigation-january-6th-attack-capitol))

What the October report added was specificity. It said Trump repeatedly pressured DOJ officials, including then-Acting Attorney General Jeff Rosen and then-Acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, and that former Acting Civil Division chief Jeffrey Clark was part of the effort to use the department to keep Trump’s election claims alive. The committee said its findings came from transcripts, testimony and internal documents gathered over eight months. ([judiciary.senate.gov](https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/dem/releases/following-8-month-investigation-senate-judiciary-committee-releases-report-on-donald-trumps-scheme-to-pressure-doj-and-overturn-the-2020-election))

By late October, the larger picture was no longer just that Trump had rejected the election result. The public record had become a dated account of who was contacted, what was requested and how far the effort went inside the Justice Department. That did not resolve the politics of the post-election fight, but it did turn part of it into a documented record investigators and lawmakers could point to rather than a dispute built only on claims and counterclaims. ([judiciary.senate.gov](https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/dem/releases/following-8-month-investigation-senate-judiciary-committee-releases-report-on-donald-trumps-scheme-to-pressure-doj-and-overturn-the-2020-election))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.