Story · May 23, 2022

Judge Throws Out Trump’s Suit Against New York’s Attorney General

Legal setback Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A federal judge dismissed Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the New York attorney general on May 27, 2022. The ruling did not end the state’s civil investigation, which remained active.

Donald Trump lost his federal lawsuit against New York Attorney General Letitia James on May 27, 2022, when U.S. District Judge Brenda K. Sannes dismissed the case in the Northern District of New York. Trump had asked the court to stop James’s office from continuing its civil investigation into the Trump Organization, but the judge declined to block the state probe.

The ruling did not end the underlying investigation. It rejected Trump’s attempt to use federal court to shut it down, leaving James’s office free to continue its work under state law. The dispute centers on allegations involving how the Trump Organization described the value of its assets and its financial condition in statements to lenders, insurers and others.

James’s office had argued the lawsuit was an effort to stop a lawful investigation before it could finish. After Sannes’s dismissal, the state’s case remained active. The decision came one day after a New York appellate court also ruled against Trump in related litigation involving the same investigation, adding to the legal pressure around the civil inquiry.

Trump has repeatedly tried to slow or stop the probe through the courts, but the federal ruling left him with no immediate relief. For now, the New York investigation stays in place, and the state can keep pressing forward with its case.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.