Story · June 27, 2022

Eastman says agents took his phone as Jan. 6 committee lines up surprise hearing

Phone seizure and surprise hearing Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This story has been updated to clarify that the Eastman filing and the Jan. 6 committee’s surprise hearing announcement were separate developments on June 27, 2022.

John Eastman said in a June 27 court filing that federal agents took his phone six days earlier during the execution of a search warrant in New Mexico. In the filing, Eastman said agents stopped him on June 22 outside a restaurant, searched him under warrant authority and seized the device. The filing was a request for the return of seized property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g). ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-mexico/nmdce/1%3A2022mc00023/476086/24/))

The warrant and Eastman’s filing tied the seizure to a broader federal investigation into events surrounding the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and the effort to overturn the 2020 election. Eastman was a central legal figure in Trump’s post-election push, including arguments that then-Vice President Mike Pence could delay or reject electoral vote certification. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-mexico/nmdce/1%3A2022mc00023/476086/24/))

Separate from Eastman’s filing, the House select committee investigating Jan. 6 said it would hold an unexpected hearing on June 28 at 1 p.m. The committee said it would present recently obtained evidence and hear witness testimony, but it did not spell out the material in advance. ([]())

The two developments were not connected on paper, but they landed on the same day and kept the Jan. 6 investigation moving on two fronts: one in court over a seized phone, the other in public with lawmakers preparing to unveil new information. Eastman’s filing did not identify what investigators were looking for, and the committee did not say who would testify at the hearing. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-mexico/nmdce/1%3A2022mc00023/476086/24/))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.