Story · July 1, 2022

Jan. 6 panel subpoenas Cipollone after Hutchinson testimony

Subpoena spiral Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This story described Pat Cipollone’s subpoena as following Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony, which it did. Hutchinson testified on June 28, 2022, and the committee subpoenaed Cipollone on June 29, 2022.

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack subpoenaed former White House counsel Pat Cipollone on June 29, 2022, a day after Cassidy Hutchinson’s public testimony put him back at the center of the panel’s inquiry. Hutchinson said Cipollone had warned against bringing Donald Trump to the Capitol and had voiced concern about the legal risk surrounding the president’s actions that day. citeturn0search0turn0search5turn0search6

The committee said it wanted Cipollone’s firsthand account of Trump’s push to overturn the 2020 election, including the false-electors effort and events tied to Jan. 6. Hutchinson’s testimony gave investigators a witness who described internal warnings inside the White House, and the subpoena made clear the panel wanted Cipollone’s version under oath. citeturn0search0turn0search5turn0search6

Cipollone had served as White House counsel, placing him near the center of conversations about what Trump and his advisers were planning, what lawyers were saying, and how the administration responded as the attack unfolded. The move signaled that the committee was not stopping with a single witness account and was pressing for testimony from people who were in the room when the critical decisions were being discussed. citeturn0search0turn0search5turn0search6

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the legislation

Read the bill or hearing record, then contact the federal lawmakers responsible for the measure and ask for a written response about the specific vote or policy at issue.

Timing: Before the next scheduled committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.