Story · September 29, 2022

Cannon Gives Dearie More Time in Mar-a-Lago Special Master Fight

Mar-a-Lago delay Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: On Sept. 29, 2022, Judge Cannon extended the special master deadline to Dec. 16 and declined, for now, to require an immediate sworn attestation about the FBI inventory. She did not resolve the underlying records dispute.

Donald Trump won a small procedural break on Sept. 29, 2022, in the Mar-a-Lago records case. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon pushed Special Master Raymond Dearie’s deadline from Nov. 30 to Dec. 16, giving the review more time, and she declined to require Trump’s lawyers to file an immediate separate sworn statement about the FBI’s inventory of seized materials.

Cannon’s ruling did not decide who is right about the seized records. It narrowed one of Dearie’s early demands: that Trump’s side respond right away to the government’s inventory and state whether it believed the list was accurate. Cannon said that step was not required at that stage, though disputes over the inventory could still be raised later with the special master.

The order left Dearie with a slower schedule and less leverage than he had tried to use in setting up the review. It also reflected the practical problem Cannon cited: the work of reviewing roughly 11,000 documents had run into delays tied to finding a vendor to scan the material.

The special-master process itself remained focused on privilege claims and other disputes over records seized from Mar-a-Lago. The Justice Department was still using the documents with classification markings in its investigation, while the special master continued working through the rest of the material. Cannon’s Sept. 29 order changed the timetable and one procedural requirement. It did not resolve the case’s bigger fight over the documents or the investigation that surrounds them.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.