Story · October 12, 2022

Judge declines to delay Trump’s Carroll deposition; Trump calls case a hoax in post

Carroll deposition fight Confidence 5/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: Judge Kaplan’s October 12 order did not itself schedule Trump’s deposition for the following week; it declined to delay discovery, and the depositions were already slated for October 14 and October 19.

A federal judge on October 12, 2022 declined to delay Donald Trump’s deposition in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case, clearing the way for questioning set for the following week. The ruling came from U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who said the case had already been delayed long enough and that discovery was close to complete. The court treated the deposition fight as a scheduling issue, not a decision on the merits of Carroll’s claims. ([nysd.uscourts.gov](https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf))

Trump responded the same day with a post on his social-media platform calling the matter a “complete con job” and saying it was “a hoax and a lie.” His message also repeated his denial that he knew Carroll or that the encounter she described ever happened. The post did not change the court’s order, but it did add another public denial to a case already headed toward sworn testimony. ([nysd.uscourts.gov](https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf))

The order fit into a larger dispute that had two moving parts. One was Carroll’s 2019 defamation case, which centered on Trump’s public attacks after she first accused him of rape. The other was a separate sexual-assault claim she planned to bring under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, a revival law that took effect later in 2022. Kaplan noted that the pending deposition could matter in that later case, but his October 12 ruling itself only dealt with whether Trump could postpone being questioned in the defamation suit. ([nysd.uscourts.gov](https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.