Story · October 12, 2022

Judge declines to delay Trump’s Carroll deposition; Trump calls case a hoax in post

Carroll deposition fight Confidence 5/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Judge Kaplan’s October 12 order did not itself schedule Trump’s deposition for the following week; it declined to delay discovery, and the depositions were already slated for October 14 and October 19.

A federal judge on October 12, 2022 declined to delay Donald Trump’s deposition in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case, clearing the way for questioning set for the following week. The ruling came from U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who said the case had already been delayed long enough and that discovery was close to complete. The court treated the deposition fight as a scheduling issue, not a decision on the merits of Carroll’s claims. ([nysd.uscourts.gov](https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf))

Trump responded the same day with a post on his social-media platform calling the matter a “complete con job” and saying it was “a hoax and a lie.” His message also repeated his denial that he knew Carroll or that the encounter she described ever happened. The post did not change the court’s order, but it did add another public denial to a case already headed toward sworn testimony. ([nysd.uscourts.gov](https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf))

The order fit into a larger dispute that had two moving parts. One was Carroll’s 2019 defamation case, which centered on Trump’s public attacks after she first accused him of rape. The other was a separate sexual-assault claim she planned to bring under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, a revival law that took effect later in 2022. Kaplan noted that the pending deposition could matter in that later case, but his October 12 ruling itself only dealt with whether Trump could postpone being questioned in the defamation suit. ([nysd.uscourts.gov](https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.