Story · February 1, 2023

New York Seeks Sanctions Over Trump Fraud Denials

Sanctions threat Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This sanctions request was filed on January 31, 2023, after Justice Arthur Engoron had already denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss earlier in January.

New York Attorney General Letitia James is asking a judge to punish Donald Trump, his adult children, the Trump Organization, and their lawyers for what her office says was a bad-faith response in the state’s civil fraud case against the family business. The filing, made on January 31, 2023, says the defendants’ answer to the lawsuit included denials that conflicted with earlier positions and repeated arguments the court had already rejected.

The motion asks Justice Arthur Engoron to impose sanctions after the attorney general’s office said the defendants denied facts they had already admitted in other proceedings and relied on defenses the court had already found weak. A senior lawyer in James’ office, Kevin Wallace, argued that the answer went beyond ordinary advocacy and crossed into conduct that could justify punishment under court rules.

The fraud case itself alleges that Trump and the Trump Organization inflated the value of golf courses, office towers and other assets to secure better terms from lenders, insurers and business partners. At the time of the sanctions request, Engoron had already denied Trump’s effort to dismiss the case and had described some defense arguments as frivolous, but the broader merits rulings in the case had not yet been issued.

Trump’s lawyers have repeatedly denied wrongdoing and argued that the case is politically driven. The sanctions request adds another layer to a lawsuit that already threatens major financial penalties and other restrictions on the Trump business in New York. It also keeps pressure on a defense team that is trying to fight the case while avoiding language the state says contradicts the record already in front of the court.

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Read the filing or order, track the case, and then contact the elected officials responsible for the policy at issue. If the story affects your community directly, pass along the primary documents and explain the real stakes.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.