Story · August 21, 2025

Court Slashes Trump’s Fraud Penalty, But Leaves Liability Intact

Fraud fine sliced, liability survives Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The appeals court vacated the monetary penalty in Trump’s civil fraud case on Aug. 21, 2025, but the ruling was split and left some legal issues unresolved even as it preserved the fraud finding and a path to further appeal.

A New York appeals court gave Donald Trump a major financial reprieve on Aug. 21, 2025, but it did not erase the fraud finding at the center of the case. In People v. Trump, the Appellate Division, First Department, vacated the disgorgement awards that had totaled roughly $464.6 million, while otherwise affirming the judgment. The panel also said the parties still had a path to seek review in the Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court.

That matters because the ruling did not wipe the case clean. The court left intact the liability finding that Trump and several co-defendants engaged in conduct the trial court had held was fraudulent under Executive Law § 63(12). What disappeared on Aug. 21 was the monetary sanction, not the underlying judgment that Trump and his business entities had crossed the line. The case therefore changed shape, but it did not disappear.

The opinion’s bottom line also undercuts any claim that the matter is fully over. The panel made clear that finality was being used to give the parties a route to appeal further, and AP reported that the judges’ decision left a pathway to the Court of Appeals. That means the fight was still live after the ruling, even as Trump gained immediate relief from the largest financial penalty imposed in the case.

The decision also corrects a point in the case record that should not be overstated: Ivanka Trump was not part of the final appeal. She had already been dismissed from the action earlier on statute-of-limitations grounds, so the Aug. 21 ruling concerned the remaining defendants and the remedy they faced, not a fresh sweep involving every Trump family member.

For Trump, the ruling was a clear win on dollars and a narrower one on law. He could claim the near-half-billion-dollar penalty was gone. He could not claim the court erased the finding that his business practices were fraudulent. Those are different things, and the appellate panel kept that line in place.

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.