The Daily Fuckup

A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.

Skip to the news
Story · April 10, 2026

Judge resets hearing in Mohanna immigration lawsuit to May 13

By The Daily Fuckup Newsroom · From the April 10, 2026 edition

Judges again, but specifically in Mohanna et al. v. Trump et al. Confidence 5/5
Courts Elections Immigration Media
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: An April 9 court order granted the parties’ stipulation and reset the hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss to May 13, 2026 at 2:00 p.m.; the reply deadline was extended to April 24, 2026.

A Northern District of California immigration case against federal government defendants is still moving, but the calendar has changed. In Mohanna et al. v. Trump et al., the court entered an order on April 9, 2026 resetting the hearing on the government’s motion to dismiss from April 22 to May 13, 2026 at 2:00 p.m.

The change followed a stipulation filed April 8, 2026. Under the revised schedule, the government’s reply deadline moved to April 24, 2026. The case remains active on the docket, and the motion to dismiss has not been resolved.

The updated schedule matters because it keeps the dispute in briefing mode for at least several more weeks before the court hears argument. The docket identifies the case as a civil immigration matter in the Northern District of California, with Judge William H. Orrick presiding. The only reliable takeaway from the record is procedural: the hearing did not stay on April 22, and it is now set for mid-May.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment

No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.