Story · July 8, 2026

Judge Refuses to Pause Mail-Voting Ruling Blocking Trump Order in 23 States and D.C.

Mail-ballot ruling stays in force Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A July 7 order denied the Justice Department’s request to stay a June 25 injunction; the underlying merits ruling blocking parts of the executive order remains in effect for the plaintiff states and the District of Columbia.
Judge Refuses to Pause Mail-Voting Ruling Blocking Trump Order in 23 States and D.C.

A federal judge in Massachusetts has refused to put on hold her June 25 ruling that blocked parts of President Donald Trump’s mail-voting order, leaving the injunction in force in 23 states and the District of Columbia while the government appeals.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani denied the Justice Department’s request for a stay pending appeal on July 7, meaning the federal defendants remain barred, for now, from enforcing the challenged provisions against the plaintiff states. Her earlier decision was a merits ruling: she granted summary judgment to the states and entered declaratory and injunctive relief against the disputed portions of the executive order and related federal action.

The case centers on an executive order that sought to tighten federal control over election-related practices, including limits affecting mail ballots. The multistate plaintiffs, led by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, argued that the administration had no authority to rewrite rules that the Constitution and federal law leave to the states and Congress. Talwani agreed at the summary-judgment stage, concluding the challenged provisions could not stand.

The latest ruling does not end the lawsuit. The administration can still pursue its appeal, and the injunction can be revisited by a higher court. But the immediate result is simple: the government did not win a pause, so the June 25 order remains operative in the jurisdictions covered by the case.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the legislation

Read the bill or hearing record, then contact the federal lawmakers responsible for the measure and ask for a written response about the specific vote or policy at issue.

Timing: Before the next scheduled committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.