Story · July 9, 2026

Court lets Cook stay for now, treating the Fed differently in Trump removal fight

Fed carve-out Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The Supreme Court on June 29, 2026, denied the government’s stay request in Trump v. Cook, allowing Lisa Cook to remain in office while the case continues. The Court did not decide the case on the merits.
Court lets Cook stay for now, treating the Fed differently in Trump removal fight reader image
Reader image selected by automatic review and community voting.

The Supreme Court on June 29, 2026, denied the government’s stay application and left Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook in office while her case continues. The order kept a lower-court injunction in place, so Cook remains on the job unless a later ruling changes that result. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf))

Cook was the first Fed governor ever targeted for removal in the central bank’s 111-year history, according to the Court’s own summary. The dispute began after President Donald Trump posted that Cook should resign on August 20, 2025, then said three days later that he was removing her for cause over mortgage-fraud allegations she has denied. The Court did not decide the case on the merits at this stage; it ruled only on the government’s request for emergency relief. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf))

In denying the stay, the justices said the government had not shown it was likely to win on the issues before the Court. The order also said the Federal Reserve’s structure and history justify a substantial threshold for “cause,” and it stressed the central bank’s long tradition of insulation from day-to-day political control. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf))

The ruling did not settle whether Trump can ultimately fire Cook. It did, however, leave the Fed in a separate category from other agency-removal fights the Court was handling that day. The practical effect for now is narrow: Cook stays in office unless and until the litigation ends another way. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

Court lets Cook stay for now, treating the Fed differently in Trump removal fight reader image 1
Score: 95 AI / 0 community
By: mike
Current main image

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.