Story · July 16, 2026

Trump gets more time to seek Supreme Court review in CNN case

Litigation limbo Confidence 5/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Trump gets more time to seek Supreme Court review in CNN case

Donald Trump has a new Supreme Court filing deadline in his case against CNN. The Court’s public docket in No. 25A1357 shows that Trump first received a 30-day extension, then filed a further request on July 1, 2026, and then got the second extension on July 10, 2026, when Justice Clarence Thomas granted the application and moved the certiorari deadline to August 14, 2026.

The application itself said Trump was seeking more time under Rule 13.5 and identified the Eleventh Circuit’s March 17, 2026 order denying rehearing en banc as the judgment he intended to challenge. It also noted that the underlying Eleventh Circuit decision came after Trump’s defamation suit against CNN was dismissed in the district court and that the appeal was from case No. 23-14044.

The docket does not say anything about the merits of a future petition, and the order does not signal how the Supreme Court may ultimately treat the case. What it does show, plainly, is that the filing clock was moved again: from the prior July 15 deadline to August 14. That gives Trump until then to ask the justices to review the Eleventh Circuit case.

Read next

Trump Asks Supreme Court for More Time in CNN Case

★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5

Trump filed a July 1 Supreme Court application asking for a 60-day extension of time to file a cert petition in Trump v. CNN, moving the deadline from July 15 to August 1…

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.