Edition · January 13, 2025

The Daily Fuckup — January 13, 2025

3 verified reports published on January 13, 2025.

This edition is the complete daily record. Reports remain separate so readers can see each claim, source set, correction, and update without one article being mislabeled as the entire edition.

Closing take

If you wanted a preview of the second Trump term, January 13 was it: legal exposure, ideological policing, and a government-in-waiting that confused loyalty with competence. The screwup was not a single implosion so much as a continuing admission that Trump’s orbit still thinks power means never having to say you’re sorry—or follow the rules.

Support the work

Help support this site

If this nightly edition saves you time, reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Ranked by how bad the fuckup was

5 stars means maximum fallout. 1 star means a smaller self-own.

Story

Trump’s hush-money conviction still stains the transition

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

The January 10 sentencing was still reverberating on January 13, with Trump having escaped punishment but not the conviction itself. That is the kind of legal win that is really a branding loss: he gets to avoid jail, but he still walks into a second term as the first president with a felony conviction on his record.

Open story + comments

Story

Jack Smith’s exit keeps Trump’s Jan. 6 nightmare in the spotlight

★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5 Serious fuckup

On January 13, the post-election Trump circus was still dealing with the fallout from Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 work and the report-making that followed it. The political problem for Trump was simple: even with the criminal case collapsing under immunity and timing, the special counsel was still leaving behind a record that framed Trump’s conduct as extraordinary, and deeply criminal in character.

Open story + comments

Story

Trump’s team starts loyalty screening at the National Security Council

★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5 Major mess

Incoming Trump officials were reportedly questioning career National Security Council staff about how they voted, what they donated, and what they posted online. That is not staffing; that is a loyalty test dressed up as personnel review, and it signals a White House more interested in ideological compliance than institutional continuity.

Open story + comments