A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.
Receipts before rhetoric
High-confidence stories with the complete reporting record one click away. TDF separates established facts, claims, disputes, uncertainty, and corrections.
The Court put a hold on lower-court orders that had forced Missouri to keep the fight over its new congressional map alive. That is a huge procedural win for the map’s defenders and a fresh reminder that election-law chaos now moves at full sprint.
A federal court issued a temporary restraining order stopping the Postal Service from enforcing a new mail-ballot rule for the November election, after Washington and 24 other states sued.
A federal court granted a temporary restraining order blocking the key parts of the USPS rule that would have forced election officials to rework ballot envelopes and federalize chunks of mail voting.
A federal judge has temporarily blocked a new Postal Service rule that would have put Washington in the middle of mail voting for federal elections, handing Trump’s election meddling another fast stop sign.
A coalition of Democratic states filed a fresh challenge after the Postal Service finalized a rule that would force states to redesign ballot procedures and hand over election-related data. The move landed alongside a separate ruling clearing part o…
A federal judge in Boston again blocked key parts of the administration’s attempt to impose sweeping new restrictions on mail voting, extending the legal chaos around the White House’s election-order push.
A coalition led by California filed suit challenging a USPS rule tied to election mail, arguing it unlawfully interferes with state election administration and could jam up mail voting heading into the midterms.
New York Attorney General Letitia James filed suit on August 26 against a new USPS rule that would force states into a federal mail-ballot regime after the Supreme Court’s stay on parts of the underlying voting order.
The Court let the administration move forward, at least for now, with an order aimed at restricting mail voting before the midterms. The immediate result is uncertainty, not clarity, for states that have already built their election systems around a…
The Court’s latest move gave Trump room to keep pushing his mail-voting restrictions, but it did not magically settle how states can actually implement them before ballots start going out.
Federal investigators found reasonable cause to believe California’s women’s prisons are violating the Constitution by failing to protect incarcerated women from staff sexual abuse and harassment.
A Massachusetts man is set for sentencing in the case tied to an alleged attempt to assassinate then-cabinet nominee Scott Bessent at the Capitol. The case is a grim reminder that political violence is not a talking point; it’s a live threat the jus…
A multistate coalition filed suit Monday saying the administration’s new tariff scheme is just a pretext to keep imposing import taxes after the Supreme Court knocked down the earlier version.
A federal appeals court blocked construction of the White House ballroom unless Congress authorizes it, turning Trump’s vanity project into a live legal humiliation.
More than two dozen states sued after the administration tied disaster funding to election and immigration conditions. The legal theory is shaky, the political message is ugly, and the practical risk lands on emergency preparedness and public safety.
Audit note: The story concerns a July 23, 2026 lawsuit in Rhode Island over DHS/FEMA grant conditions for 2026 funding.
A federal grand jury on July 9 indicted eight men in a case tied to the June 14 UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House, according to the Justice Department. Prosecutors say the charges include conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists a…
Audit note: Correction: This case concerns the June 14 UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House, and the eight-man indictment was returned on July 9, 2026.
A federal judge dismissed the remaining Proud Boys seditious-conspiracy charges on July 11 after the Justice Department sought dismissal in light of Trump’s Jan. 20, 2025 clemency proclamation.
Audit note: Correction: A federal judge dismissed the remaining Proud Boys seditious-conspiracy charges on July 11, 2026, after the Justice Department moved to vacate the convictions and dismiss the case. Trump’s Jan. 20, 2025 clem…
On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment, while also addressing the scope of the injunction in the case.
Audit note: Correction: The Supreme Court decided the birthright-citizenship case on June 30, 2026, and also addressed the scope of the injunction below.
The White House said on April 8 that Iran had agreed to a ceasefire after Operation Epic Fury, and the House voted 215-208 on June 3 to direct the president to end U.S. military involvement in Iran without explicit congressional authorization.
Audit note: Correction: The White House ceasefire statement was issued on April 8, 2026, and the House passed the Iran war powers resolution on June 3, 2026.
A federal grand jury in North Carolina indicted James Comey on April 28, 2026, over an Instagram post prosecutors say amounted to a threat. The post at issue was made on May 15, 2025 and showed seashells arranged to read “86 47.”
A Justice Department settlement announced May 18, 2026, bars the IRS from pursuing covered claims and examinations tied to Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and The Trump Organization for returns filed before that date. Critics say the deal…
Audit note: Correction: This settlement bars IRS examinations and related review only for the covered returns and claims filed before May 18, 2026; it is not a blanket IRS audit ban.
Federal prosecutors say a California man was arraigned on April 27, 2026, after the April 25 White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting and was charged with attempting to assassinate the president.
Audit note: Correction: The shooting occurred on April 25, 2026. DOJ announced charges on April 27, 2026.
The White House told Congress that hostilities with Iran had “terminated” right as the War Powers deadline hit, a move that looks designed to avoid a vote on continued military action. The administration says the ceasefire is enough; critics say it …
Audit note: The White House said hostilities with Iran had “terminated” and argued the War Powers clock no longer applied; critics dispute that interpretation.
The tariff fight is no longer just about presidential power in the abstract. On April 20, U.S. Customs and Border Protection is slated to open the refund process for importers seeking money back on duties tied to the administration’s emergency tarif…
Audit note: Correction: CBP began accepting tariff-refund claims on April 20, 2026, through an online portal starting at 8 a.m. The process applies in phases and does not mean all refunds are immediately payable.
CBP opened a phased tariff-refund claims process on April 20, 2026, for eligible importers tied to the Supreme Court’s Feb. 20, 2026 IEEPA ruling. It is not a blanket repayment program for every duty collected.
Audit note: A previous version overstated the court ruling’s procedural description; the refund process began April 20, 2026, but eligibility and timing remain limited and phased.
Trump used Easter Sunday to threaten bombing Iran’s power plants and bridges if the Strait of Hormuz stayed closed, then doubled down with a fresh deadline. The post triggered immediate backlash and raised questions about escalation, civilian harm, …
Audit note: Correction: President Trump issued the warning on April 5 and set a Tuesday evening deadline to reopen the Strait of Hormuz; the story has been updated to reflect the timing and wording more precisely.
The administration spent March 24 trying to contain the fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s sweeping tariffs, and the result was more confusion, more legal wrangling, and no clean exit. The government was still resisting …
Audit note: Correction: An earlier version misstated the timing of the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling and the follow-on refund proceedings. The lower-court refund fight began after the high court’s ruling last month, with key orders…
The aftershocks of Trump’s illegal tariff push kept spreading on February 26, with the White House still trapped in damage control after the Supreme Court blew up the core policy and importers kept moving to recover what they paid. The problem for T…
Audit note: A previous version overstated the Supreme Court’s ruling by suggesting it created a refund entitlement or mechanism. The Court invalidated the tariffs but did not set out how refunds would be processed.
Companies kept heading to court on February 24, 2026, to get their money back after Trump’s tariff scheme was ruled illegal, turning the day of his State of the Union into a live audit of his economic judgment.
Audit note: Correction: the Supreme Court held that IEEPA did not authorize the tariffs; it did not itself establish a refund process. Refund claims are being pursued separately in the Court of International Trade.
Trump’s pardon of Juan Orlando Hernández erased a 45-year federal sentence for cocaine-trafficking and weapons convictions and set off immediate criticism over the timing and the beneficiary.
Audit note: Correction: The pardon was granted Dec. 1, 2025. Hernández was released from U.S. custody shortly afterward.
Reporting on Nov. 28 raised allegations that a Sept. 2, 2025 U.S. strike on a boat in the Caribbean was followed by a second attack that may have killed survivors. The claim was disputed, but it quickly intensified scrutiny on Defense Secretary Pete…
Audit note: Correction: Senators pressed the Pentagon for video and records on Dec. 3, not Nov. 28. The details of the Sept. 2 strike remain under review.
On Nov. 27, 2025, Trump used remarks about the Washington shooting of two National Guard members to demand a review of Afghan arrivals. Officials had identified the suspect as an Afghan national, but investigators had not yet established a motive.
Audit note: Correction: Officials said investigators were still seeking a motive at the time; the story has been updated to reflect that the motive had not yet been determined.
A Rhode Island federal judge ordered USDA to use available funds to fully cover November SNAP benefits, and the Trump administration quickly asked appeals courts and the Supreme Court to stop the order. The Supreme Court then issued an administrativ…
Audit note: Correction: An earlier version misstated the timing of the Supreme Court stay proceedings. Justice Jackson entered an administrative stay on Nov. 7, and the application was later referred to the full Court and withdrawn…
Trump’s USDA had been prepared to let November SNAP payments lapse during the shutdown, but federal judges forced the administration to keep the food-aid program running. By Monday, the White House had been pushed into a partial-funding posture that…
Audit note: A previous version misstated when USDA changed its November SNAP guidance from 50% to 65%.
Two federal judges moved nearly at once to block the administration from cutting off November SNAP benefits during the shutdown, blowing up a plan that would have hit tens of millions of people. The White House tried to frame the problem as a legal …
Audit note: Correction: The court orders required USDA to use SNAP contingency funds and report back on whether it would fund November benefits partially or fully; they did not guarantee full, on-time November payments.
Two federal judges ordered the Trump administration to keep SNAP funded with emergency reserves, stopping a plan to freeze benefits at the start of November. The ruling undercut an administration argument that the shutdown left it no choice, and it …
Audit note: Correction: A First Circuit order on Nov. 7, 2025, denied an administrative stay in the SNAP case. An earlier district court ruling on Oct. 31/Nov. 1 required the government to either fully fund November SNAP using avai…
The White House said more than 4,000 federal workers could be fired during the shutdown, a day after President Donald Trump ordered the Pentagon to make sure troops were paid. The Smithsonian then said its museums, research centers and National Zoo …
Audit note: Correction: An earlier Smithsonian shutdown plan already said the museums, research centers and National Zoo would remain open through Oct. 11 and close starting Oct. 12 if the shutdown continued.
A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted former FBI Director James Comey on September 25, 2025, alleging false statements and obstruction tied to his September 30, 2020 Senate testimony. The Justice Department said Comey is …
Audit note: Correction: This story has been updated to clarify that the indictment was returned on September 25, 2025, and that reaction claims are attributed to news coverage rather than the Justice Department releases.
A federal appeals court ruled on August 29 that most of Trump’s sweeping global tariffs exceeded presidential authority, dealing the White House a serious legal defeat even as the ruling was stayed pending possible Supreme Court review.
Audit note: Correction: the Federal Circuit ruled that the tariffs exceeded the president’s authority under IEEPA, but it vacated the permanent injunction and remanded; the tariffs were left in place temporarily while further proce…
A Federal Reserve governor sued Trump after he tried to fire her, turning his latest attack on central-bank independence into an immediate legal and political mess.
Audit note: Correction: Lisa Cook sued on Aug. 28, 2025 after President Trump said on Aug. 25 that he was removing her from the Federal Reserve Board. The lawsuit seeks to block the removal while the case proceeds.
Trump said on August 25, 2025 that he was removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over mortgage-related allegations that she disputed. Cook said he had no authority to do it and said she would challenge the move, leaving the legality of the acti…
Audit note: Correction: This story has been updated to clarify that President Trump announced he was removing Lisa Cook on Aug. 25, 2025, and that Cook said he had no authority to do so and would challenge the move.
After meeting Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, 2025, Trump moved from stressing an immediate ceasefire toward saying a broader peace agreement should be the goal. No deal to end the war was announced.
Audit note: Correction: After the Alaska summit on August 15, 2025, Trump said the best path was a broader peace agreement rather than an immediate ceasefire; no deal was announced.
Trump ordered U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites and immediately set off a constitutional fight over war powers, with Democrats blasting him for acting without congressional authorization and allies abroad bracing for retaliation. The White…
Audit note: Correction: This story misstated the timing of some White House and congressional documents. The U.S. strikes took place on June 21, the administration’s War Powers notification was submitted June 23, and the Senate war…
On June 21, 2025, Trump announced U.S. strikes on Iran’s Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites and said the mission was a success that should force peace. The White House transcript said the facilities were hit, but independent damage assessments…
Audit note: Correction: This story refers to the June 21, 2025 U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in U.S. Eastern time. A UTC timestamp would place the attack on June 22.
The White House and its lawyers escalated the Los Angeles confrontation instead of de-escalating it, defending the troop deployment, dismissing California’s lawsuit, and leaving the impression that the administration was eager to turn a local protes…
Audit note: Correction: California filed its emergency request on June 10, but the court had not ruled on it as of June 11.
Trump said on June 8 that he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act if he decided the Los Angeles unrest amounted to an insurrection, as California pressed ahead with court challenges to the Guard and Marine deployments.
Audit note: Correction: Los Angeles imposed a downtown curfew on June 10, not June 11. Trump had not invoked the Insurrection Act as of June 11.
Trump’s decision to federalize California National Guard troops, followed by a Marine deployment, turned the Los Angeles protest response into an immediate legal and political brawl. California sued the same day, calling the move illegal and unneces…
Audit note: Correction: California sued on June 9 after Trump federalized 2,000 National Guard members on June 7 and later added 2,000 more personnel plus 700 Marines on June 9.
Federalizing the National Guard in Los Angeles over the governor’s objection handed Trump a fresh overreach fight and made the administration look eager to meet civil unrest with military theater.
Audit note: Correction: A second Defense Department order on June 9 added 2,000 California National Guard members; the original June 7 White House statement covered the initial 2,000-troop deployment.
Trump’s plan to accept a luxury Boeing 747 from Qatar kept drawing fierce scrutiny on May 14 as senators, ethics watchdogs, and national-security hawks warned that the gift looked like a foreign influence nightmare in slow motion. The White House wa…
Audit note: This article has been updated to clarify that, as of May 14, 2025, the Qatar aircraft transfer was still under consideration and had not yet been completed.
By April 20, 2025, the Kilmar Abrego Garcia litigation had become a fight over whether the Trump administration would answer a judge’s questions with facts or keep pushing for delay. Judge Paula Xinis had ordered targeted discovery in the return cas…
Audit note: Correction: The court entered the expedited-discovery order on April 15, not April 16. As of April 20, the case was in fact-finding on compliance; no contempt ruling had been entered.
California sued on April 16, 2025, arguing that President Donald Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose a 10% baseline tariff and higher reciprocal tariffs on selected trading partners goes beyond what Congress allowed.
Audit note: Correction: California filed its lawsuit on April 16, 2025, challenging Trump’s tariff program; it did not file on April 17.
Trump’s Oval Office meeting with Nayib Bukele on April 14 turned the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia into a public hardening of the administration’s refusal to fix a deportation the government says was an error. That refusal, paired with Bukele’s dismi…
Audit note: Correction: The Supreme Court did not order the government to immediately return Kilmar Abrego Garcia; it said the government must facilitate his release and return and sent the case back for clarification. Trump and Bu…
The Supreme Court said the Trump administration must facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man the government says it wrongly sent to El Salvador. The court’s order left implementation questions for the lower court and did not it…
Audit note: Correction: The Supreme Court did not itself order Kilmar Abrego Garcia returned immediately; it said the government must facilitate his release and report on steps taken, and sent the case back for clarification.
Trump’s fresh push to investigate Chris Krebs and Miles Taylor landed like a public demonstration of how far he is willing to bend the presidency toward revenge. The action triggered immediate alarm because the memoranda did not point to a specific …
Audit note: Correction: The White House memorandum directed agencies to revoke any active security clearance Chris Krebs may hold; it did not confirm that he had an active clearance at the time.
Trump announced a 90-day pause on most country-specific reciprocal tariffs on April 9, keeping a 10 percent baseline in place while raising China’s tariff rate to 125 percent. The move eased some of the market pressure his trade rollout had created,…
Audit note: This story has been corrected to clarify tariff timing and to remove/soften unsupported interpretation about motive and market causation.
Markets kept melting down as Trump’s new tariff regime fed fears of a broader economic slowdown, with investors and foreign governments reacting to a policy rollout that still looked improvised and punitive. The damage was visible in selloffs, emerg…
Audit note: Correction: An earlier version misstated the timing of the de minimis change; the White House said the China and Hong Kong de minimis rule would end May 2, not April 2. It also blurred the April 2 tariff order with late…
The damage from Trump’s tariff barrage was still metastasizing on April 6, with markets set up for another rough week and businesses facing a growing cloud of uncertainty. The trade war had already spilled into losses, layoffs fears, and a fresh rou…
Audit note: Correction: This article has been updated to clarify the tariff chronology and to soften language describing market effects that were still unfolding on April 6, 2025.
On April 6, 2025, Trump defended his tariff strategy aboard Air Force One, saying he would not back down even as the market selloff set off by his April 2 announcement kept rolling through Wall Street. The White House video and AP reporting show a p…
Audit note: Correction: The White House posted the Air Force One video on April 7, 2025; the clip itself is labeled Apr. 6, 2025. The tariff action began April 2, and China retaliated April 4.
China’s retaliation against Trump’s sweeping new tariffs was the clearest sign yet that the White House had kicked off a global trade fight it may not be able to control. The answer from Beijing was immediate, blunt, and big enough to deepen the fea…
Audit note: Correction: China announced on April 4, 2025, that it would impose a 34% tariff on all U.S. goods effective April 10, in response to Trump’s April 2 reciprocal-tariff order.
Markets extended their selloff Friday after China answered Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement with a 34% tariff on U.S. goods. The S&P 500 had its worst day since 2020, and the Dow fell about 2,231 points as investors priced in slower growth and hi…
Audit note: Correction: China announced a 34% retaliatory tariff on U.S. goods on April 4, to take effect April 10. The story has been updated to clarify the timing of the retaliation and the tariff order.
Beijing hit back at Trump’s new tariff barrage with a 34 percent tax on U.S. imports, plus export controls and other penalties. That made clear the White House had not projected strength so much as invited escalation.
Audit note: Correction: China announced a 34% tariff on U.S. goods effective April 10, and separately imposed immediate export controls on certain medium and heavy rare-earth-related items on April 4.
Trump’s April 2 tariff rollout and China’s April 4 announcement of a 34% retaliatory tariff, set to take effect April 10, helped drive a sharp market drop. The S&P 500 fell 6%, the Dow lost 2,231 points, and the Nasdaq slid 5.8%.
Audit note: China announced a 34% retaliatory tariff on U.S. goods on April 4, 2025, effective April 10; U.S. stocks fell sharply that day amid the escalating tariff fight.
Wall Street’s first full trading day after Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement ended in a sharp selloff, with major indexes falling as investors digested the new duties and the risk of retaliation.
Audit note: Correction: The market selloff described here happened on Thursday, April 3, 2025, after the April 2 tariff order was signed.
Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement set a 10% baseline duty on imports from nearly all countries, with higher country-specific rates for many trading partners. The move jolted markets, drew warnings of retaliation, and raised fresh fears of a wider …
Audit note: Correction: The tariff package was announced on April 2, 2025; the 10% baseline took effect April 5, and the higher reciprocal tariffs were scheduled for April 9.
President Donald Trump’s March 25, 2025 elections executive order directs federal agencies to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship on the federal voter registration form, presses officials to treat ballots received after Election Day as lat…
Audit note: Correction: An earlier version misstated the filing date of the League of Women Voters lawsuit. It was filed on April 1, 2025, not March 31.
A leak of sensitive war-planning chatter on Signal kept dominating the day as senior Trump officials were pressed to explain why top national-security business was being conducted in an app that auto-deletes messages. The public defense was basicall…
Audit note: Correction: This article has been updated to clarify what was known on March 25, 2025 about the Signal chat, and to distinguish between the White House’s Houthi strike statement and reporting about the leak itself.
On March 24, 2025, the Trump administration told Judge James Boasberg it would invoke the state secrets privilege and not provide more detail about Venezuelan deportation flights. The judge was already pressing for timing information to determine wh…
Audit note: Correction: The administration invoked the state-secrets privilege on March 24, 2025, after Judge Boasberg’s March 15 order in the deportation case.
Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act set off a fast-moving legal fight over deportations of Venezuelans, with judges and lawyers immediately zeroing in on due process and the limits of wartime authority. By March 16, the administration’s effo…
Audit note: Correction: The proclamation was dated March 15, 2025, and the initial court order and later expanded relief also occurred that day.
Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act to target alleged Tren de Aragua members, a move that immediately drew emergency litigation and revived fears he was trying to use wartime authority as a peacetime immigration shortcut.
Audit note: Correction: The proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act was issued on March 14, 2025, and litigation followed on March 15, 2025.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia was detained by ICE on March 12, 2025, the same case that would soon become a national symbol of Trump’s deportation chaos. The arrest fed a fast-moving disaster in which the administration’s own actions collided with court prot…
Audit note: An earlier version misstated or blurred key dates and legal details in the Abrego Garcia case. He was arrested on March 12, 2025 and deported on March 15, 2025, despite a 2019 withholding-of-removal order.
The diplomatic fallout from President Donald Trump’s February 28 Oval Office meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky was still building on March 2, when European leaders gathered in London to restate support for Ukraine and keep a peace plan tied to the Uni…
Audit note: Correction: An earlier version of this story overstates some details of the diplomatic fallout. The Oval Office clash, cancellation of the minerals signing, and canceled news conference occurred on Feb. 28, 2025; subseq…
A Feb. 28 Oval Office meeting between President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy turned into a heated public confrontation. The White House then canceled the planned signing of a minerals agreement an…
Audit note: Correction: The Feb. 28 Oval Office meeting between President Trump, Vice President JD Vance and President Zelenskyy ended without a signed minerals deal, and the planned joint news conference was canceled after the exc…
Civil-rights lawyers filed suit Feb. 12 challenging the Trump administration’s transfer of migrants to Guantánamo Bay and alleging the detainees lacked regular access to counsel and relatives. The filing says the government’s setup at the base is bl…
Audit note: Correction: this lawsuit was filed Feb. 12, 2025, seeking access to counsel and family contact for migrants held at Guantánamo; it did not primarily challenge the transfer policy itself.
On February 10, 2025, Trump paused new Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement, pardoned Rod Blagojevich, and the Justice Department directed prosecutors to seek dismissal of the Eric Adams case. Those were separate actions, but taken together the…
Audit note: Correction: The Justice Department moved on February 10 to seek dismissal of the Eric Adams case; it had not been dismissed yet.
A federal judge in Washington state blocked Trump’s birthright-citizenship order with a nationwide preliminary injunction, dealing the administration a sharp early setback. The ruling put a hard brake on one of Trump’s most aggressive immigration mo…
Audit note: Correction: a federal judge in Washington state issued a preliminary injunction on Feb. 6, 2025, temporarily blocking enforcement of the birthright-citizenship order nationwide.
The White House rescinded a memo freezing federal loans and grants after it triggered confusion, alarm, and legal challenges across the country. Even after the reversal, officials insisted the underlying policy goals still stood, which only undersco…
Audit note: Correction: OMB rescinded its January 27 guidance on January 29. The rescission ended that memo, but other funding reviews and legal disputes continued separately.
A federal judge on January 23 temporarily blocked Trump’s order trying to deny citizenship to some babies born in the United States, calling the policy unconstitutional in an early hearing. The ruling instantly undercut one of the administration’s m…
Audit note: Correction: A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on Jan. 23, 2025, blocking enforcement of the birthright-citizenship order; the court did not make a final ruling on the merits.
On Jan. 20, 2025, Trump signed a proclamation commuting 14 Jan. 6 sentences, pardoning other people convicted of offenses related to events at or near the U.S. Capitol, and directing the Justice Department to seek dismissal of pending Jan. 6 indictm…
Trump’s emergency bid to stop his New York sentencing collapsed, leaving him to face a felony judgment just days before taking office. It was a blunt reminder that even a friendly-leaning Supreme Court will not always save him from ordinary criminal…
Audit note: Correction: The Supreme Court denied Donald Trump’s emergency request on Jan. 9, 2025, and sentencing proceeded on Jan. 10, 2025, when the court imposed an unconditional discharge.
Trump used a high-profile interview and day’s worth of coverage to say Jan. 6 pardons would begin almost immediately after he takes office, reviving one of the ugliest promises from his post-election reset. The statement gave critics a fresh target …
Audit note: Correction: TIME’s fact-check on this interview was published Dec. 11, 2024, and the transcript was published Dec. 12, 2024.