Story · March 24, 2025

Trump administration uses state secrets claim in deportation fight

State secrets dodge Confidence 5/5
★★★★★Fuckup rating 5/5
Five-alarm fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: The administration invoked the state-secrets privilege on March 24, 2025, after Judge Boasberg’s March 15 order in the deportation case.

The Trump administration said on March 24, 2025, that it would invoke the state secrets privilege and withhold more information about Venezuelan deportation flights that were already at the center of a federal court fight. The filing came after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg had entered a March 15 temporary restraining order and was asking for flight timing and other details to determine whether the government had complied with it. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/31217ce8ef990c9bd6ecb49654b6bf47?utm_source=openai))

The dispute turned on chronology. Boasberg’s order temporarily blocked deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century wartime law the administration had used to justify removing Venezuelan nationals it said were tied to Tren de Aragua. The court was trying to establish whether planes carrying migrants had already left U.S. control before the order took effect, or whether the removals continued after the judge told the government to stop. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/31217ce8ef990c9bd6ecb49654b6bf47?utm_source=openai))

The state-secrets filing did not answer that question. It signaled that the administration would not supply additional operational details the court wanted in order to test the government’s account of what happened around the flights. That kept the legal fight focused on a narrower but crucial issue: whether the government followed the March 15 order, and if not, when it crossed the line. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/31217ce8ef990c9bd6ecb49654b6bf47?utm_source=openai))

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.