Story · July 13, 2026

Eight men indicted in White House UFC plot case after June event

Security theater Confidence 5/5
★★★★★Fuckup rating 5/5
Five-alarm fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This case concerns the June 14 UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House, and the eight-man indictment was returned on July 9, 2026.
Eight men indicted in White House UFC plot case after June event

A federal grand jury in Columbus returned a two-count indictment on July 9 against eight men accused in a plot the Justice Department says targeted the UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House on June 14. Prosecutors say the case centers on allegations that the group prepared for an attack involving weapons, body armor, ammunition, explosives and drones. The defendants are presumed innocent unless the government proves the case in court.

The indictment folds together earlier criminal complaints and arrests that began in June. DOJ says five men were first charged in connection with the alleged plan, then two more were arrested about a week later in Washington and Missouri. This week, federal authorities arrested an eighth defendant, Chandler D. Scaggs, in West Virginia, and brought him into the case.

According to the indictment, the defendants face charges of conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists and conspiracy to commit murder on federal government territory and to murder a federal government official. DOJ says the alleged plan included discussions of attacking government officials and other attendees at the White House event.

The charging papers say the investigation spanned multiple jurisdictions and involved the FBI, the U.S. Secret Service and several U.S. attorney’s offices. They also say the alleged scheme began in online chats and evolved into planning around targets, logistics and escape routes.

What the filing does not do is prove the accusations. It makes them formal. The government now has to test the case in court, where the evidence — not the press release — will decide what sticks.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.