Even though the storm itself had moved on, Trump’s false Alabama warning was still a live political wound on September 8, with the NOAA side of the story continuing to draw scrutiny. Federal weather officials had already been dragged into an awkward defense of the president’s inaccurate claim, and the episode remained a textbook example of how Trump’s insistence on being right can force agencies to bend the facts around him.
First recorded Sep 8, 2019·Meaningfully updated Sep 8, 2019
Returning reader
What changed
The Alabama Dorian mess keeps embarrassing Trump
Even though the storm itself had moved on, Trump’s false Alabama warning was still a live political wound on September 8, with the NOAA side of the story continuing to draw scrutiny. Federal weather officials had already been dragged into an awkward defense of the president’s inaccurate claim, and the episode remained a textbook example of how Trump’s insistence on being right can force agencies to bend the facts around him.
Even though the storm itself had moved on, Trump’s false Alabama warning was still a live political wound on September 8, with the NOAA side of the story continuing to draw scrutiny. Federal weather officials had already been dragged into an awkward defense of the president’s inaccurate claim, and the episode remained a textbook example of how Trump’s insistence on being right can force agencies to bend the facts ar…
Truth standard
What TDF can prove
The linked reports preserve their sources, audit notes, confidence rating, corrections, and comments. The page Q&A below is restricted to those connected materials and will say when the evidence does not establish an answer.