A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.
After backlash over a sudden shift in coronavirus testing guidance, the CDC moved on September 18 to restore its recommendation that people exposed to COVID-19 should be tested even if they had no symptoms. The reversal made the earlier change look exactly like what critics said it was: a political interference job dressed up as public health.
Why it matters: Science meddling
Returning reader
After backlash over a sudden shift in coronavirus testing guidance, the CDC moved on September 18 to restore its recommendation that people exposed to COVID-19 should be tested even if they had no symptoms. The reversal made the earlier change look exactly like what critics said it was: a political interference job dressed up as public health.
Read the complete verified updateComplete record
Newest first
After backlash over a sudden shift in coronavirus testing guidance, the CDC moved on September 18 to restore its recommendation that people exposed to COVID-19 should be tested even if they had no symptoms. The reversal made the earlier change look exactly like what critics said it was: a political interference job dressed up as public health.
Truth standard
The linked reports preserve their sources, audit notes, confidence rating, corrections, and comments. The page Q&A below is restricted to those connected materials and will say when the evidence does not establish an answer.