A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.
The January 6 committee extended Mark Meadows’s deadline for documents and testimony after his side kept wrangling over custody, privilege, and compliance. It was a procedural move, but it also underlined how the former chief of staff had become another Trump-world witness treating a subpoena like a suggestion.
Why it matters: subpoena stall
Returning reader
The January 6 committee extended Mark Meadows’s deadline for documents and testimony after his side kept wrangling over custody, privilege, and compliance. It was a procedural move, but it also underlined how the former chief of staff had become another Trump-world witness treating a subpoena like a suggestion.
Read the complete verified updateComplete record
Newest first
The January 6 committee extended Mark Meadows’s deadline for documents and testimony after his side kept wrangling over custody, privilege, and compliance. It was a procedural move, but it also underlined how the former chief of staff had become another Trump-world witness treating a subpoena like a suggestion.
Truth standard
The linked reports preserve their sources, audit notes, confidence rating, corrections, and comments. The page Q&A below is restricted to those connected materials and will say when the evidence does not establish an answer.