A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.
The White House’s domestic-terrorism strategy leaned hard into sweeping language about political violence and “organized” threats, but the rollout raised immediate alarms about how broadly the administration was defining the problem and how easily the framework could be turned against disfavored speech and protest.
Why it matters: Domestic terror overreach
Returning reader
The White House’s domestic-terrorism strategy leaned hard into sweeping language about political violence and “organized” threats, but the rollout raised immediate alarms about how broadly the administration was defining the problem and how easily the framework could be turned against disfavored speech and protest.
Read the complete verified updateComplete record
Newest first
The White House’s domestic-terrorism strategy leaned hard into sweeping language about political violence and “organized” threats, but the rollout raised immediate alarms about how broadly the administration was defining the problem and how easily the framework could be turned against disfavored speech and protest.
Truth standard
The linked reports preserve their sources, audit notes, confidence rating, corrections, and comments. The page Q&A below is restricted to those connected materials and will say when the evidence does not establish an answer.