Story · June 14, 2021

Nadler said House Judiciary would open a probe into DOJ records requests for lawmakers and journalists

House Judiciary opened a records-and-subpoenas probe into Trump-era DOJ tactics Confidence 5/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This story concerns an announced House Judiciary investigation into DOJ’s use of subpoenas and other legal authorities to obtain communication records; it did not establish unlawful surveillance or abuse.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said on June 14, 2021, that the committee would open an investigation into Justice Department surveillance and records collection involving members of Congress, congressional staffers, and the news media. The statement came after the Justice Department’s inspector general had already announced its own review on June 11, 2021, into DOJ’s use of subpoenas and other legal authorities to obtain communication records from those groups in leak investigations. ([nadler.house.gov](https://nadler.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=394671&utm_source=openai))

Nadler’s announcement was framed around compulsory process, nondisclosure orders, and the handling of records requests during the Trump administration. The House committee said it would investigate the practice; it did not issue findings that day and did not establish that any unlawful surveillance had occurred. That distinction matters because the June 14 action was an opening step, not a completed factual conclusion. ([nadler.house.gov](https://nadler.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=394671&utm_source=openai))

The inspector general’s review focused on DOJ’s use of subpoenas and other legal authorities to obtain communication records of members of Congress and affiliated persons, as well as the news media. DOJ’s later report said the department had used compulsory process to seek non-content communications records from members of Congress, congressional staffers, and members of the news media between 2017 and 2020. ([oig.justice.gov](https://oig.justice.gov/news/doj-oig-initiates-review-department-justices-use-subpoenas-and-other-legal-authorities-obtain?utm_source=openai))

That set up a straightforward oversight question for the House panel: who approved the requests, what rules governed them, and whether DOJ followed its own policies when the targets were lawmakers and journalists. On June 14, Nadler said the committee would pursue those answers. He did not claim the investigation had already proven abuse. ([nadler.house.gov](https://nadler.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=394671&utm_source=openai))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.