Story · June 18, 2021

Giuliani’s New York law license interim-suspended over 2020 election claims

Election lie penalty Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Rudy Giuliani was interim-suspended from practicing law in New York on June 24, 2021, pending further disciplinary proceedings.

Rudy Giuliani was interim-suspended from practicing law in New York on June 24, 2021, after a state appellate court found there was enough evidence that his statements about the 2020 election were false and misleading. The order took effect immediately and was not a final disbarment or permanent sanction.

The Appellate Division, First Department said the suspension was warranted while disciplinary proceedings continued. The court’s action focused on Giuliani’s conduct as a lawyer, including statements he made in connection with efforts to challenge the election results, rather than on the election outcome itself.

Giuliani had become one of the most visible legal figures in Donald Trump’s post-election push. In that role, he repeatedly promoted claims of election fraud even as courts and election officials rejected them. The New York ruling did not resolve those fraud claims. It addressed whether Giuliani, as a licensed attorney, had crossed the line by making statements the court found unsupported and misleading.

The suspension meant Giuliani could not practice law in New York unless and until the court lifted the interim order. The disciplinary case remained open, with any final outcome left for later proceedings. The immediate consequence was simple: Giuliani was off the New York bar while the process ran its course.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.