Story · January 29, 2022

Trump’s records dispute was still unresolved on Jan. 29

Documents mess Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The Jan. 29, 2022 date did not mark a new public step in the records dispute; it reflects an already ongoing NARA recovery process that had begun earlier in January.

By Jan. 29, 2022, the National Archives was already dealing with the Trump records mess, but the public timeline was still incomplete. The agency had been in contact with representatives for former President Donald Trump during 2021, and those discussions led to the transfer of 15 boxes to the Archives in January 2022. NARA later said those records were being recovered under the Presidential Records Act, which requires presidential records to be preserved and turned over to the agency at the end of an administration. ([archives.gov](https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/ferriero-response-to-02.09.2022-maloney-letter.02.18.2022.pdf))

What was not public on Jan. 29 was the classified-material finding that would later sharpen the fight. In a Feb. 18, 2022 response to Congress, Archivist David Ferriero said NARA had identified items marked as classified national security information in the boxes. That same letter said NARA had asked Trump representatives to keep searching for any additional presidential records that had not been transferred. ([archives.gov](https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/ferriero-response-to-02.09.2022-maloney-letter.02.18.2022.pdf))

NARA’s Feb. 7, 2022 public statement, posted on its records page for the 15 boxes, said the agency had received the materials and was continuing to process related FOIA requests. The same page shows the agency later broke out releases tied to the 15-box transfer as it processed the records. On Jan. 29, though, the public record was still about a records-recovery effort, not a fully disclosed classification dispute. ([archives.gov](https://www.archives.gov/foia/15-boxes))

The clean version of this story is simple: the records transfer had already happened, the Archives was still pressing for more material, and the classified-marked items were not publicly confirmed until Feb. 18. That is the chronology, and it is the one that holds up. ([archives.gov](https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/ferriero-response-to-02.09.2022-maloney-letter.02.18.2022.pdf))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.