Story · March 9, 2022

New York Trump Probe Turned on a February Order and a March Deadline

Finance probe Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: March 9, 2022 was a date during an ongoing New York attorney general probe, not the date of a major new ruling or filing.

The key date in New York’s Trump financial investigation was not March 9, 2022. It was February 17, when a state judge denied Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr.’s bid to quash subpoenas and granted the attorney general’s request to compel them. The order required production of a range of documents tied to the office’s civil inquiry into the Trump Organization’s financial dealings. ([nycourts.gov](https://www.nycourts.gov/Reporter/pdfs/2022/2022_30538.pdf))

That order initially set a March 3 deadline for Trump to turn over the documents. The attorney general later said her office agreed to extend that deadline to March 31, after Trump asked for more time. According to the filing, Trump did not challenge that timing on appeal, then raised new objections on March 31 and refused to produce responsive documents. ([ag.ny.gov](https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/attorney-general-james-files-motion-hold-donald-j-trump-contempt-failure-comply))

The testimony dispute was on a separate track. On February 14, the attorney general filed a reply in her office’s effort to force sworn testimony from Trump, Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, saying the investigation had found misrepresentations in Trump’s statements of financial condition and that Mazars had told the Trump Organization its financial statements from 2011 through 2020 should no longer be relied upon. ([ag.ny.gov](https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/attorney-general-james-files-reply-ongoing-efforts-force-donald-j-trump-donald))

So the story in early March was procedural, not dramatic: a February court order, a document deadline that was later pushed back, and an ongoing fight over whether the Trumps would sit for testimony. March 9 was the date on the calendar, not the date of the ruling that moved the case. ([nycourts.gov](https://www.nycourts.gov/Reporter/pdfs/2022/2022_30538.pdf))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.