Story · July 13, 2022

Trump Reportedly Tried To Reach A Jan. 6 Witness

witness pressure Confidence 4/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The Jan. 6 committee said it had referred an alleged attempt by Donald Trump to contact a witness to the Justice Department, but it did not say it had established witness tampering. Later reporting identified the witness as a White House support staffer.

The Jan. 6 select committee said on July 12, 2022, that Donald Trump had tried to contact an unnamed witness in its investigation, and later reporting identified that person as a White House support staffer who had been speaking with the panel. The reported outreach put a fresh spotlight on a probe already focused on Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his allies’ pressure campaign after the Capitol attack.

The committee did not say it had proven witness tampering. Instead, it said it referred the reported contact attempt to the Justice Department and left open the question of what, if any, legal significance the episode had. That distinction matters. A reported attempt to reach someone tied to the investigation is not the same thing as a finding that a crime occurred.

Still, the allegation fit uneasily beside the broader record the committee had been building. By mid-July 2022, public hearings and witness testimony had already shown that people around Trump told him repeatedly that his fraud claims were unsupported, yet he kept pushing them. Investigators had also described pressure aimed at election officials, aides, and other institutions that resisted the effort to reverse the result.

Against that backdrop, the reported contact attempt raised obvious questions about motive and timing. If the witness was indeed speaking with investigators, any effort by Trump to reach that person would naturally invite scrutiny. But the reporting did not establish that the contact was successful, that any message was delivered, or that Trump had been found to have interfered with testimony.

For Trump, the episode added to an already damaging pattern: even as the Jan. 6 investigation advanced, he remained connected to the events under review and to the people who could describe them. The committee’s referral ensured the matter would not just stay a political story. It also put the question in the hands of federal prosecutors, who would decide whether the reported contact attempt warranted further action.

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.