Story · September 18, 2022

DOJ Presses Appeal in Mar-a-Lago Documents Fight as Special-Master Review Continues

Docs fight Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: The Justice Department filed its 11th Circuit request on Sept. 16, 2022, not Sept. 17.

The Mar-a-Lago documents fight was still moving on two tracks on Sept. 17, 2022: Donald Trump was defending the special-master review ordered by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, and the Justice Department was asking the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to narrow or pause that order so investigators could keep reviewing records tied to the criminal probe. The filing made the posture plain. The government wanted access to the materials for an active investigation. Trump’s side wanted a court-appointed filter in front of that review.

The dispute grew out of the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago on Aug. 8, 2022, which produced records that investigators said included documents marked classified. Judge Cannon later agreed to appoint a special master to review the seized materials and temporarily restricted the government’s use of some of them. DOJ then moved to appeal portions of that ruling, arguing the court should not have blocked investigators from using at least some of the records in the probe. The back-and-forth was no longer just about custody of paper. It was about who would get to inspect the seized materials, on what timetable, and under what limits.

Trump’s legal team continued to press claims that a special master was needed to separate potentially privileged material from the rest of the seizure. DOJ’s position was the opposite: the criminal investigation could not be held up while privilege disputes were sorted through a separate review process. That disagreement mattered because it went to the core of how fast investigators could examine what they had recovered and whether any of the seized records could be used immediately.

By this point, the case had become a major test of the rules that apply when a former president is the subject of a federal document inquiry. The public filings had already put the search, the seized records, and the special-master fight on the record. What remained unsettled on Sept. 17 was how much room Trump would get to slow the government’s review — and how much of the material the appeals court would let investigators keep using while the broader fight played out.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.