Story · January 5, 2023

Trump gets pulled into the House speaker circus

GOP chaos Confidence 4/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: An online Trump-for-Donalds endorsement was fabricated. Trump had actually backed Kevin McCarthy and called the Donalds claim fake and fraudulent.

House Republicans spent January 5, 2023 still stuck in a speaker race that had already failed to produce a winner on January 3 and January 4. The chamber kept voting, the votes kept coming up short, and the caucus kept showing the country a leadership fight it could not quickly contain. Official House records show the impasse stretching across multiple ballots before Republicans finally moved toward a resolution later in the week. ([clerk.house.gov](https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202318?utm_source=openai))

That context matters because the Trump-related noise around the fight was narrower than the original story suggested. On January 4, Trump posted on Truth Social backing Kevin McCarthy and urging Republican members to “vote for Kevin.” The following day, a fabricated image and statement falsely attributed to Trump circulated online, claiming he had endorsed Byron Donalds for speaker. Trump said that claimed endorsement was “fake and fraudulent.” ([vanityfair.com](https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/01/kevin-mccarthy-speaker-endorsement-donald-trump?utm_source=openai))

So the real story was not that Trump himself issued a misleading endorsement and then got tangled up in the aftermath. It was that a forged Trump statement became one more layer of confusion around an already broken vote. The House fight was loud enough on its own: Republicans could not close ranks, members kept changing their votes, and the speakership remained unresolved while the country watched. The fake Trump image only added a fresh burst of misinformation to a proceeding that was already failing in public. ([clerk.house.gov](https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202318?utm_source=openai))

Trump still mattered to the episode because his blessing remained part of the pressure system around McCarthy’s bid. But the evidence on the record points to a more limited, more specific role than the original copy described. Trump’s actual public statement on January 4 supported McCarthy. The false Byron Donalds endorsement was a separate online fabrication that spread the next day. Those are not the same thing, and the distinction is the whole correction. ([vanityfair.com](https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/01/kevin-mccarthy-speaker-endorsement-donald-trump?utm_source=openai))

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.