Story · January 25, 2023

New York fraud case stayed on track after Trump lost his bid to dismiss it

Civil fraud lawsuit remained alive after dismissal motion was denied Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

By January 25, 2023, the New York attorney general’s civil fraud case against Donald Trump was still moving forward in state court. A Manhattan judge had denied Trump’s motion to dismiss the case on January 6, 2023, leaving the lawsuit in place while the parties continued pretrial litigation. ([ag.ny.gov](https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/attorney-general-james-sues-donald-trump-years-financial-fraud))

The lawsuit, filed on September 21, 2022, accused Trump, the Trump Organization, and several family members and executives of using false or misleading statements of financial condition over a span of years. The attorney general said the defendants inflated asset values to secure better loan terms, satisfy lending covenants, obtain insurance at lower premiums, and seek other financial benefits. Those were allegations in a complaint, not findings of liability on the January 25 date in question. ([ag.ny.gov](https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/attorney-general-james-sues-donald-trump-years-financial-fraud))

The January 6 ruling did not decide whether Trump was liable. It meant only that the case survived the first effort to end it at the pleading stage, so the legal fight continued instead of stopping on a motion to dismiss. As of the edition date, the core question remained unresolved: whether the financial statements at issue were fraudulent as the attorney general alleged. ([ag.ny.gov](https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/trump-decision.pdf))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.