Story · February 15, 2023

Judge Rejects Trump’s Late DNA Offer in Carroll Case

Delay gambit Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

NEW YORK — A federal judge on Wednesday, February 15, 2023, rejected Donald Trump’s offer to provide a DNA sample in the E. Jean Carroll case, calling the move too late in a discovery fight that had already run for years. U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan denied the request and kept the case on track for an April 25 trial. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/18559887d50aaf6300ad6658c3872282?utm_source=openai))

Trump’s lawyers had floated the DNA offer on February 10 as part of an exchange tied to other materials in the record. Kaplan said the proposal came after the court-ordered discovery window had closed and after both sides had long had the chance to pursue the issue. In his order, he said Trump had not shown good cause to reopen discovery for the dispute over the missing pages of the DNA report. ([courthousenews.com](https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/carroll-trump-dna-discovery-order-southern-district-new-york.pdf?utm_source=openai))

The DNA question had been in the case for years. Carroll’s team had sought a sample from Trump earlier in the litigation, while Trump had not agreed to provide one during the discovery period. Kaplan wrote that the latest request arrived too close to trial and would have complicated a case that was already set for a jury. ([courthousenews.com](https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/carroll-trump-dna-discovery-order-southern-district-new-york.pdf?utm_source=openai))

The ruling did not decide Carroll’s underlying claims or say what any jury should make of the evidence. It did, however, shut down this particular pretrial detour and leave the April 25 schedule intact. Other motions and disputes could still surface, but the court was not willing to reset the clock for a belated DNA fight. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1%3A2022cv10016/590045/56/?utm_source=openai))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.