Story · April 23, 2023

Trump Heads Toward a Carroll Trial That Will Put Old Denials Back on the Record

Trial countdown Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: A March 10 court ruling, not the March 23 order, first allowed the Access Hollywood tape and testimony from Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff at trial.

Donald Trump spent April 23, 2023, with a trial date two days away and a record he had spent years trying to outrun. E. Jean Carroll’s civil case against him was scheduled to open on April 25, 2023, in federal court in Manhattan, and the pretrial rulings already told the shape of the fight: the jury would not just hear Carroll’s account, but also evidence the judge had found relevant to Trump’s treatment of women. A court order entered March 23, 2023, allowed the jury to hear the Access Hollywood tape and to hear from Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff, two women who say Trump sexually assaulted them. ([transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov](https://transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov/carroll-v-trump?utm_source=openai))

That matters because the case was not being framed around one isolated accusation in a vacuum. The judge’s evidentiary ruling meant the trial could place Carroll’s claims alongside other sworn accounts and Trump’s own words, including the 2005 recording in which he bragged about grabbing women without permission. The question for the jury was not whether Trump had built a louder public persona over the years; it was whether the evidence undercut his denials and supported Carroll’s version of events. The admissibility ruling did not decide the case, but it did narrow the space Trump had to argue inside. ([transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov](https://transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov/carroll-v-trump?utm_source=openai))

By April 23, the practical reality was simple: the courthouse clock was ticking, and Trump was heading into a trial where his past comments and conduct were no longer just campaign baggage. They were evidence. The opening date was set, the witness list had been trimmed to what the court would allow, and the case was positioned to force jurors to weigh Trump’s public denials against material already deemed fair game for trial. For a defendant who has long treated counterattack as a defense strategy, that is a bad legal setup. It leaves less room for bluster and more room for the record. ([transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov](https://transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov/carroll-v-trump?utm_source=openai))

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.