Story · June 23, 2023

Prosecutors ask to move Trump classified-documents trial to December

Delay drama Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: Prosecutors asked for a Dec. 11 trial date; the previously proposed Aug. 14 date was not yet the court’s final trial setting.

On June 23, 2023, special counsel Jack Smith’s team asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to move the start of Donald Trump’s classified-documents trial from Aug. 14 to Dec. 11. The filing said the request was about time, not drama: prosecutors said they needed more room to handle discovery, process classified materials and deal with security-clearance requirements for defense lawyers who would need access to sensitive evidence. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/2407d098248008989df2e68b42f36c47))

The case centers on allegations that Trump kept government records after leaving the White House, including classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, and that he took steps to obstruct efforts to recover them. The June 23 motion did not decide any of those issues. It simply asked for a new schedule that prosecutors said would better fit the demands of a national-security case. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/2407d098248008989df2e68b42f36c47))

The timing mattered because the docket had already become part of the broader political fight around Trump’s legal exposure. A later trial date would give both sides more time to litigate pretrial issues, and it would also keep the case from moving quickly into the merits. But the filing itself was narrow: prosecutors said they needed the extra time to prepare the case properly and to manage the classified evidence under the court’s rules. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/2407d098248008989df2e68b42f36c47))

The request also undercut the idea that the case was barreling toward an imminent trial on its existing schedule. Instead, it showed a prosecution still working through the ordinary mechanics of a complex federal case with sensitive records at the center. The government was not asking the court to drop the case or to rule on the facts. It was asking for a later trial date so the parties could finish the work needed before jury selection starts. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/2407d098248008989df2e68b42f36c47))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.