Story · July 13, 2023

Mar-a-Lago Video Review Preceded Later Deletion Allegation

Footage chronology clarified Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This story has been corrected to clarify that, on July 13, 2023, prosecutors were reviewing Mar-a-Lago security footage as evidence; the later allegation about a deleted-video scheme was not made public until July 27, 2023.

On July 13, 2023, the Mar-a-Lago security-video issue was still an evidence question, not yet the later obstruction allegation. Public reporting and court filings available that day showed prosecutors were examining surveillance footage from the Florida club as part of their effort to reconstruct how boxes and records were moved around the property.

That mattered because video can do more than confirm that records existed. It can show who handled them, when they were moved, and whether the timeline in the case matches witness accounts. By July 13, the public record supported only that narrower point: investigators were looking at the footage as part of the documents probe.

The separate claim that Donald Trump, Walt Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira asked a Trump employee to delete security-camera footage had not yet been made public on July 13. That allegation appeared later, in a superseding indictment returned on July 27, 2023. Keeping those two moments apart is the key chronology here: first the review of the video, then the later public accusation about deleting it.

So the story on July 13 was not that prosecutors had already disclosed a deletion scheme. It was that the footage itself had become part of the case file, and investigators were still using it to map movement inside Mar-a-Lago before the next round of charges arrived.

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.