Story · August 27, 2023

Trump Lawyer Says Trial Dates Would Be Hard To Square With Campaign

Calendar collision Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: An earlier version of this story overdescribed the relevance of the Florida filing; the Fox News Sunday comments and Jack Smith’s Aug. 1 statement remain accurately described.

Donald Trump’s legal team used Sunday television to make a simple case about time: the courtroom calendar is going to be a problem for a candidate already running a presidential campaign. That was the thrust of Alina Habba’s appearance on Fox News Sunday, where she said Trump would not need to “prep much” because he “did nothing wrong” and argued that the proposed trial dates were unrealistic. ([foxnews.com](https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/fox-news-sunday-august-27-2023))

Habba’s point was not that Trump was backing away from the charges. It was that the defense sees little reason to treat preparation as a major burden and expects the schedules in the cases to slip. In her exchange with Shannon Bream, she said no judge would put a defendant through two trials at once in different states and described the dates as overlapping and theatrical. That is a defense argument, not a ruling. ([foxnews.com](https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/fox-news-sunday-august-27-2023))

The timing fight is real because the legal calendar is already moving. On Aug. 1, 2023, special counsel Jack Smith said in a statement that his office would seek a speedy trial in the election-interference case so the evidence could be tested in court and judged by a jury. That earlier statement matters here because Habba was responding to the practical pressure created by active criminal cases, not to some same-day development on the broadcast. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco-smith/speech/special-counsel-jack-smith-delivers-statement-0))

The Florida classified-documents case was also active at the time, adding another set of filings and deadlines to Trump’s legal load. The court filing in United States v. Trump, Nauta and De Oliveira shows the separate federal case in Florida, which is one more reason the defense has been arguing that court dates and campaign travel will compete for the same hours on the same calendar. ([]())

None of that settles the charges. It does, however, show the strategy: Trump’s lawyers are trying to turn scheduling into part of the public argument. Their message is that the former president can keep campaigning while challenging the prosecutions, and that the courts are the ones asking too much of the same 2024 schedule. ([foxnews.com](https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/fox-news-sunday-august-27-2023))

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.