Story · October 30, 2023

Judge restores Trump gag order after Meadows post

Gag order back Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

A federal judge in Washington put Donald Trump back under a limited gag order on October 29, 2023, after prosecutors said he used the brief pause in the restriction to post about Mark Meadows, his former White House chief of staff and a likely witness in the election-interference case. Judge Tanya Chutkan had temporarily stayed the order on October 20 while she considered Trump’s request to keep it on hold during his appeal. ([courthousenews.com](https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/chutkan-reimposed-gag-order.pdf))

In her written ruling, Chutkan said Trump’s post about Meadows would almost certainly violate the order because it singled out a foreseeable witness, described possible testimony as a lie and could be read as an attempt to influence or deter that witness from participating. She contrasted that post with broader attacks on the Justice Department and the prosecution, which she said were still allowed because they did not aim at specific people tied to the case. ([courthousenews.com](https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/chutkan-reimposed-gag-order.pdf))

The order remains narrow. It bars Trump from public comments about likely witnesses, prosecutors, court staff and other participants in the case, but it does not stop him from criticizing the government, the charges or special counsel Jack Smith’s office in general terms. Chutkan also denied the government’s request to make compliance with the gag order a condition of Trump’s release while he awaits trial, saying that step was not needed to enforce the ruling at this point. ([courthousenews.com](https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/chutkan-reimposed-gag-order.pdf))

Trump’s lawyers said they would seek emergency relief from the appeals court, and Trump called the restriction unconstitutional on social media after the ruling. The decision adds to a growing list of court-imposed limits on his public attacks in cases against him, including a New York civil-fraud proceeding in which he was fined for violating a separate gag order. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/trump-capitol-riot-jack-smith-gag-order-1357b62d5800b73746241db424875a4f))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.