The Daily Fuckup

A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.

Skip to the news
Story · November 3, 2023

Appeals court leaves Ivanka Trump testimony date in place after delay bid fails

By The Daily Fuckup Newsroom · From the November 3, 2023 edition

procedural setback Confidence 5/5
Climate Courts Economy Immigration Media
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A New York appeals court denied Ivanka Trump’s request to pause her testimony; the Nov. 8 date had already been set by the trial judge.

A New York appeals court turned down Ivanka Trump’s bid to pause her testimony in her father’s civil fraud trial, leaving the Nov. 8 date already set by the trial judge in place. The lower court had already pushed her appearance back from Oct. 27 to give attorneys more time to question her.

The ruling meant the schedule stayed on the path set earlier in the week. Ivanka Trump remained on track to testify after Donald Trump’s own appearance in the same case, which was brought by the New York attorney general over alleged financial fraud tied to the Trump family business.

The appellate panel did not remove Ivanka Trump from the witness list or disturb the rescheduling order. It simply refused to stop the testimony from going forward on the later date.

The fight was procedural, but it mattered because it closed off one more attempt to push the testimony back in a case already marked by repeated scheduling disputes and appeals.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Further reporting

Read other reputable coverage

These links are surfaced automatically only when the audit pipeline finds reputable outside coverage that helps readers compare reporting without rewriting it.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment

No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.