Story · December 15, 2023

Maine holds hearing on Trump ballot challenge

Ballot threat Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Maine held a hearing on the Trump ballot challenge on Dec. 15, 2023; Secretary of State Shenna Bellows issued her disqualification decision on Dec. 28, 2023.

Maine’s challenge process for Donald Trump reached a formal hearing on Dec. 15, 2023, when Secretary of State Shenna Bellows convened proceedings on petitions seeking to keep him off the state’s Republican presidential primary ballot. The hearing was part of an administrative review of whether Trump met Maine’s ballot-access requirements in light of objections grounded in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Bellows did not rule that day. According to later court filings, the Dec. 15 proceeding was the hearing date, and her decision came later, on Dec. 28.

The hearing put Trump’s eligibility into a state election process that had a fixed record, a deadline and a legal standard. That mattered because the question was no longer just a campaign argument or a political talking point. It was an official challenge that required evidence and legal briefing. The process also covered multiple challenges at once, turning the ballot fight into a single case file rather than a loose set of public complaints.

Trump’s side argued that he should remain on the ballot and that the challenge should not be used to bar him from seeking the Republican nomination. The challengers argued that his conduct surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol made him ineligible under the Constitution. Those claims were the subject of the December hearing; they were not resolved by it.

Bellows later issued her decision on Dec. 28, 2023, finding Trump disqualified from Maine’s ballot and staying the ruling for appellate review. But on Dec. 15, the key fact was narrower: Maine had opened the hearing, not finished the case. That distinction matters. The hearing marked the start of the state’s formal review of a high-stakes constitutional challenge. The ruling came almost two weeks later.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.