Story · January 18, 2024

Trump’s ballot fight was on the Supreme Court’s fast track as a key filing came due

Ballot fight Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

Donald Trump’s Supreme Court ballot fight hit another procedural marker on Jan. 18, when his merits brief was due in Trump v. Anderson. The case is about whether he can stay on the Colorado Republican primary ballot after the state’s highest court said he was disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The timing was already set. On Jan. 5, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and put it on an accelerated schedule, setting oral argument for Feb. 8 and compressing the briefing calendar around that date. Trump’s opening brief was due Jan. 18, the respondents’ briefs were due Jan. 31, and any reply was due Feb. 5. The Court’s docket shows the case moving on a pace designed to get the issue in front of the justices quickly. citeturn0search0turn0search1

The dispute began with a Dec. 19, 2023 ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court, which said Trump should not appear on the Colorado Republican primary ballot. That decision, and the state court cases that followed, set up the federal question now before the justices: whether Section 3 bars him from running. The Supreme Court’s Jan. 5 order accepted review and set the argument date without waiting for the usual slower schedule. citeturn0search0turn0search1

By the time the Jan. 18 filing deadline arrived, the case was already moving on the Court’s timetable, not the campaign’s. The argument date was fixed, the briefing window was tight, and the ballot dispute had become a matter for the justices on an expedited track. citeturn0search0turn0search1turn0search2

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.